Centrum Analiz Spoleczno-Ekonomicznych Think Tank Niezalezny Instytut Badawczy Ekonomia stosowana Miedzynarodowe projekty badawcze i doradcze Publikacje i konferencje
Sienkiewicza 12, 00-010 Warsaw, Poland
tel.: +48 226226627
fax: (+48 22) 828 60 69
case@case-research.eu
 Site map
Search 


Events

KIEV, 8 December 2008, 14:00 to 18:00
Development of the Leading Indicators for Economic Growth Cycles in Ukraine
CHISINAU, 11 December 2008, 9:00 to 14:00
The Impact of Migration on the Rural Sector of the Republic of Moldova: Social and Economic Aspects
KIEV, 11 December 2008, 9:30 to 13:00
Scenarios of Social Privileges and Benefits Monetization




Latest Publications

Study and Analysis No.374: Regional Inequality and Convergence in Europe, 1995-2005

Study and Analysis No.373: Paзвитие стран СНГ после выхода из трансформационного кризиca

Polish Economic Outlook 3/2008: Special Feature - Resilience of the Polish Economy

Network E-brief 9/2008: Free Trade Agreement Between The European Union and Armenia: How Feasible Is It?

Network E-brief 8/2008: Free Trade Agreement Between The European Union and Georgia: How Feasible Is It?

Network Report No.82: Institutional Convergence of CIS Towards European Benchmarks


e-Newsletter



Last update
2007-06-27


Eastern and Central Europe and CIS: Regional Synthesis
Authors/Editors: Piotr Kozarzewski
Richard Woodward
Year of issue: 2006
Description:

Kozarzewski P., Woodward R., Eastern and Central Europe and CIS: Regional Synthesis [in:] Fanelli J.M., Macmahon G. (eds.), Understanding Market Reforms. Volume 2: Motivation, Implementation and Sustainability, Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., October 2006.

The authors have prepared a synthesis of the work of research teams that had been evaluating the reforms in selected CEE and CIS countries.

The authors of the chapter were seeking answers for the following three basic questions:
1. Why did some countries undertake ambitious reform projects, while others did not?
2. What factors enabled some countries to successfully implement their reform program, while the program quickly failed in others? 
3. Why were some reforms more successful at delivering expected outcomes than others?

The authors claim that there is strong evidence that the post-Communist transformation is a very complex process with a set of interdependent technical, institutional, social, and political factors. With respect to the mechanics of reform, they also find that, while country specifics must be respected and taken into account, a proper match of sound reform design, sequencing, and speed is crucial.

========
More information about the book can be found at the Palgrave Macmillan site: http://www.palgrave.com/flyer/flyer.asp?is=1403949417


 previous



Home page | About CASE | Projects | Events | Publications | Work with CASE